You can theoretically merge the two notations in the same diagram, but personally I find it less readable and would not advise it. The interfaces details are then defined in another more detailed diagram. BOUML est une suite doutils UML 2 libres comprenant un modeleur permettant de spécifier et de générer des codes C , Java, Idl et PHP. This is very practical when you have no much to say about the interface itself, but want to show what interfaces a class implements (lollipop) or is dependent on (socket). The circle is in my view better suitable for the lollipop notation of an interface. Especially if you have properties and operations. Sections 1 Classe interne statique 2 Classe interne non statique 2.1 Référence aux membres de la classe englobante 2. Elle peut donc accéder aux membres de la classe externe. Maybe I'm old school, but instead of using the circle for the interface, I'd advise for the more conventional interface as with a class box with the keyword «interface» above the name of the interface. Une classe interne est déclarée à lintérieur dune autre classe. Your UML representationįirst of all, I'd like to reinforce Bruno's remark about the difference between generalization (plain line) and realization (dotted line). une classe peut être représentée dans plusieurs diagrammes, présenter un plat de nouille avec trop de classes dans les diagrammes nest pas une bonne solution. But if not, it would make sense to allow such interchangeability and replace ISMS and IEmail with a single more general INotification. But only you can answer this question: If your design requires to keep those communication channels distinct (and maybe your real code adds some differences between the two interfaces), it's fine. The question is however if SMS and email could not be used interchangeably. ![]() The decomposition of the interfaces into IStorable and IMessage seems at first sight to be a sound application of interface segregation principle.Ĭombining the two interfaces into a reusable ISMS interface instead of directly implementing them in a concrete SMS class will in this regard keep your code more maintainable, since it will easily allow to replace the SMS implementation with an alternative one (which makes sense if you consider that SMS functionality can be platform specific). This outputs the output file according to the rules in the %Config hash passed at initialisation of the object and the template.I have a couple of remarks on top of Bruno's already very clear answer. ![]() $handler->output() # any arguments are ignored. This parses the named file and returns 1 if successful or 0 if the file could not be opened. ![]() =head1 ACCESS METHODS $handler->Parse(filename) # where filename includes full or relative path. ) my %asp = ( regex => '\w .asp', wildcards =>, ) =head1 CONSTRUCTION METHOD use Autodia::Handler::ASP my $handler = Autodia::Handler::ASP->New(\%Config) This creates a new handler using the Configuration hash to provide rules selected at the command line. ![]() (C)Copyright 2001 A Trevena # AutoDIA comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY see COPYING file # This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute # it under certain conditions see COPYING file for details # Created by Gnavicks # Version 1.0 # Febru# package Autodia::Handler::ASP require Exporter use strict # requires 'my' keyword on variables use vars qw($VERSION use Autodia::Handler use Data::Dumper # enables the Dumper method = qw(Autodia::Handler Exporter) use Autodia::Diagram #- # Constructor Methods # new inherited from Handler #- # Access Methods # parse_file inherited from Handler #- # Internal Methods # _initialise inherited from Handler sub _parse # end _discard_line() #- 1 # =head1 NAME Autodia::Handler::ASP - AutoDia handler for ASP =head1 INTRODUCTION Autodia::Handler::ASP is registered in the Autodia.pm module, which contains a hash of language names and the name of their respective language - in this case: %language_handlers = (. I cleaned up the ASP.pm file a bit (see below): # AutoDIA - Automatic Dia XML.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |